Patrick on Nostr: I think I get your point at the autistic level but doesn't that leave a vagueness to ...
I think I get your point at the autistic level but doesn't that leave a vagueness to the definition of custodial?
Wouldn't giving my money to Tom to hold for me be a riskier endeavor than giving it to a local board that now has reputational risk spread across it's members? Maybe Tom is a dick but probabilistically wouldn't there be a lower chance that the consensus of Tom, Peter, Frank, George and Lisa are all dicks since it increases the total reputation on the line across all members?
Wouldn't giving my money to Tom to hold for me be a riskier endeavor than giving it to a local board that now has reputational risk spread across it's members? Maybe Tom is a dick but probabilistically wouldn't there be a lower chance that the consensus of Tom, Peter, Frank, George and Lisa are all dicks since it increases the total reputation on the line across all members?