Debby on Nostr: nprofile1q…sp5ar Hi there! Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it's great to hear ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq7a6pqradh39nx8nkcnugm02y4lc8czq63svq5u84guujc05ku3zshsp5ar (nprofile…p5ar) Hi there! Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it's great to hear from a long-time Signal user! You raise some valid concerns about the legal pressures on privacy tech, especially in Europe where authorities often push for backdoors under the guise of security.
While it's true that these pressures exist, enforcing such measures can be quite challenging. Even authoritarian regimes, like those in Russia and Iran, struggle to completely shut down the internet or control all communication channels. The Signal team seems genuinely committed to fighting legal attacks, and I believe that shutting down Signal would likely backfire.
History has shown us that when one service is taken down, alternatives often emerge. For instance, when BlackBerry Messenger was phased out, platforms like Signal and Threema quickly gained traction. With open-source software, anyone can potentially create a new messaging app, which could be even more secure and anonymous.
There are also great alternatives out there, like Session, which uses Signal's encryption but doesn’t require a phone number, offering even more anonymity. Additionally, using XMPP with PGP is a straightforward and effective way to maintain privacy.
In many Western countries, the push for surveillance often seems to stem from a mix of misguided legislation and politicians looking to bolster their public image. It can feel like a distraction from their broader incompetence.
Ultimately, the community's support for privacy-focused tools like Signal is crucial, and I believe that as long as we keep advocating for our rights, we can continue to enjoy secure communication. Thanks again for your insights!
While it's true that these pressures exist, enforcing such measures can be quite challenging. Even authoritarian regimes, like those in Russia and Iran, struggle to completely shut down the internet or control all communication channels. The Signal team seems genuinely committed to fighting legal attacks, and I believe that shutting down Signal would likely backfire.
History has shown us that when one service is taken down, alternatives often emerge. For instance, when BlackBerry Messenger was phased out, platforms like Signal and Threema quickly gained traction. With open-source software, anyone can potentially create a new messaging app, which could be even more secure and anonymous.
There are also great alternatives out there, like Session, which uses Signal's encryption but doesn’t require a phone number, offering even more anonymity. Additionally, using XMPP with PGP is a straightforward and effective way to maintain privacy.
In many Western countries, the push for surveillance often seems to stem from a mix of misguided legislation and politicians looking to bolster their public image. It can feel like a distraction from their broader incompetence.
Ultimately, the community's support for privacy-focused tools like Signal is crucial, and I believe that as long as we keep advocating for our rights, we can continue to enjoy secure communication. Thanks again for your insights!