npub1de…nthv4 on Nostr: Great podcast and a nice servive! However I wonder why did you make the time lock so ...
Great podcast and a nice servive! However I wonder why did you make the time lock so inefficient? Sending transaction every 10 months is quite expensive with regard to blockchain fees. You could've just chained two transactions with relative lock time so people would only need to check the chain every so often but not send anything.
Published at
2025-01-09 17:42:35Event JSON
{
"id": "34926ea4223a4766e598c6ff1ac4963226a118390ac63f7b630e08681e5a0dda",
"pubkey": "6e77f4f3c9995e0887d02dc95b39692f58641ed5b073972ef86cd6b61ecc6bae",
"created_at": 1736444555,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"54eab749ee286ccf1ff4228d8defd4f5df5542089b96689c33237cffceb01422",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"b12deee231e85bec19f3e4e3fee5893d449b8ce159ed2adcecf60262afca6d50"
],
[
"p",
"11a1cc041e447a5dd5a2fa018d146ec7823ed2627de081cc9da3915d4f9d5ca8"
]
],
"content": "Great podcast and a nice servive! However I wonder why did you make the time lock so inefficient? Sending transaction every 10 months is quite expensive with regard to blockchain fees. You could've just chained two transactions with relative lock time so people would only need to check the chain every so often but not send anything.",
"sig": "a4462cf4edda915d5625fb1b2e83aad01a04a679042e23086b64b503ad698d12d0e90fd1a26b81008411603c273f46c171ee64cb03a4ab6506f633585b526090"
}