Event JSON
{
"id": "348ddb0c804a8f8d04db9731e2f7cc7dbccddb990e0b3e51008ba166618898a0",
"pubkey": "549d5f91c1391f106fa12df496b12526f778020108a54d4f3d8354ae6906b5b4",
"created_at": 1691483941,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"8967f290cc7749fd3d232fb7110c05db746a31fce0635aeec4e111ad8bfc810d",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"826e9f895b81ab41a4522268b249e68d02ca81608def562a493cee35ffc5c759",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"d987084c48390a290f5d2a34603ae64f55137d9b4affced8c0eae030eb222a25",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"e1055729d51e037b3c14e8c56e2c79c22183385d94aadb32e5dc88092cd0fef4",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"t",
"Bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
]
],
"content": "Seeing more and more talk about cost of capital concerns on #Bitcoin lightning channels. I'm not sure cost of capital is the correct framing in the argument? Is this not first a safety / risk of loss and then networking, routing or connectedness concern rather than CoC. Once above is solved we can more accurately price the risk of lightning channel (and benefit of liquidity) vs. safety of cold storage.\n\nAm I thinking about this incorrectly?\nnostr:npub139nl9yxvwayl60fr97m3zrq9md6x5v0uup344mkyuyg6mzlusyxs4zkwf4\nnostr:npub1sfhflz2msx45rfzjyf5tyj0x35pv4qtq3hh4v2jf8nhrtl79cavsl2ymqt\nnostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a\nnostr:npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc\nnostr:npub1uyz4w2w4rcphk0q5arzkutrecgscxwzajj4dkvh9mjyqjtxslm6qea8632",
"sig": "b8377f10c7033ca25e6ce9a5d12be7dbd2181981cddfe94744f9649508eaf16933c22f8fbcd6bd91f6dfff881be5525b94b435f5453c99e3d67908505ad2f457"
}
