Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30 📝 Original message: I’m not entirely clear ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30
📝 Original message:
I’m not entirely clear on how you intended to use OP_CAT.

I was thinking something along the lines of

<block hash> <partial merkle tree for transaction> <transaction> OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY OP_DROP



- Eric


> On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com> writes:
>> I don’t know if anyone has done any research or published anything in
>> this regard, but one of the major issues with bitcoin I’ve been trying
>> to solve is how to properly incentivize nodes to construct SPV proofs.
>
> This can almost be done via P2SH, but not quite:
>
> 1) OP_CAT is disabled :(
> 2) The txlen limit might bite, I'd have to do the maths.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150729/04d17efb/attachment.sig>;