xavier on Nostr: There is information asymmetry, some are better informed, others less. Many ...

There is information asymmetry, some are better informed, others less. Many collectives have intentional information silos, so those in power can stay in power. Others use radical transparency, which is better, but then everyone has a different skill sets and Dunning-Kruger types start wasting everybody else's time. You don't need democracy and everyone to vote on everything. There are ways to make decentralized yet focused and efficient dev teams, but those are never implemented because from a guy who gets funding and is his own boss, you turn into an equal and judged by others. Peer review is hated by the ego, everybody tries to avoid it. If there is any voting, my number one priority would be complete anonymity, not even commit-reveal schemes.