waxwing on Nostr: Why are you describing the backdoor in DUAL_EC_DRBG, without referencing/naming it? ...
Why are you describing the backdoor in DUAL_EC_DRBG, without referencing/naming it?
That's separate. It *is* an issue of NUMS not being used, which is *analogous*, but it's different to the lack of NUMS generation of constants in curves defined by NIST etc.
(The link is certainly relevant though, of course; these details, in case you weren't aware, were already known in the bitcoin world in 2013).
Published at
2023-04-30 23:53:57Event JSON
{
"id": "36aebd4e37bad827a99de5a610661835cfdf95d41f6578c0ed09becfdf3754fc",
"pubkey": "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
"created_at": 1682898837,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"545ada485241cc09b1d98450280138cd3c0cc1fdc73f55cb7eede8358043ea7d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c09086fb0f9805296ec0c0591cf1aad14d7c7dbe6fa7468e40010d5ea9fe2dd2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"0000006a13e10fb648049b5e78632a0c2bf09eaf6a9d55d081b82baf86c951be"
],
[
"p",
"0000006a13e10fb648049b5e78632a0c2bf09eaf6a9d55d081b82baf86c951be"
],
[
"p",
"82341f882b6eabcd2ba7f1ef90aad961cf074af15b9ef44a09f9d2a8fbfbe6a2"
],
[
"p",
"52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd"
]
],
"content": "Why are you describing the backdoor in DUAL_EC_DRBG, without referencing/naming it?\n\nThat's separate. It *is* an issue of NUMS not being used, which is *analogous*, but it's different to the lack of NUMS generation of constants in curves defined by NIST etc.\n\n(The link is certainly relevant though, of course; these details, in case you weren't aware, were already known in the bitcoin world in 2013).",
"sig": "ab7470921b30ec1ced5e90b9972426f35cbf1a4a2b8175471934be574b7bd0c386411556a92ad0824354a3ee54f6604376297db95b7c204335ec66d0583f369c"
}