Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12 📝 Original message:On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:49 ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12
📝 Original message:On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
>
> How does my replace-by-fee patch *not* do that?

Does it broadcast a double spend only if it IS replacing an earlier? If yes, I am fine with it.

Tamas Blummer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/a0014230/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/a0014230/attachment.sig>;