steve on Nostr: ...
TL;DR: this rubric helps us characterize #stocks in our universes for each of our investment strategies. I hope you find it useful.
We use a fundamental factor scoring system (worst: 0 to best: 5) to suggest the #quality of the company. Then we project worst case & best case 5 year price targets to estimate the upside potential.
High quality companies (4s & 5s) with attractive upside to our worst case scenario never automatically qualify for #investment, but they do get flagged for deeper #fundamentalanalysis. Good #companies with currently unattractive stock price upsides are considered for our "Bullpen." We are neither deep value investors, nor do we short stocks.
Published at
2023-04-07 20:30:02Event JSON
{
"id": "3f4ac9dcfae69094723135b1c4fb4ca25fde1a10a5a7f5c37e522620d8ffbaf8",
"pubkey": "7ed9f5234be7b40d5ab786fbbd5c7065f852a396ae1e02afe2e53c72c16c17b9",
"created_at": 1680899402,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"stocks"
],
[
"t",
"quality"
],
[
"t",
"investment"
],
[
"t",
"fundamentalanalysis"
],
[
"t",
"companies"
]
],
"content": "https://nostr.build/i/nostr.build_174646ac530d90b6444dab712093f40285fe9173d5ddd57e134cf53749a2a60f.jpg \n\nTL;DR: this rubric helps us characterize #stocks in our universes for each of our investment strategies. I hope you find it useful. \n\nWe use a fundamental factor scoring system (worst: 0 to best: 5) to suggest the #quality of the company. Then we project worst case \u0026 best case 5 year price targets to estimate the upside potential. \n \nHigh quality companies (4s \u0026 5s) with attractive upside to our worst case scenario never automatically qualify for #investment, but they do get flagged for deeper #fundamentalanalysis. Good #companies with currently unattractive stock price upsides are considered for our \"Bullpen.\" We are neither deep value investors, nor do we short stocks.",
"sig": "73e2d6e70482fd9ffc5360fcf4e2bd357aa97918d65a700fe925c30e2010319fb122b72fffdf3f96dffbcafc7829e9b4eb702801d5abd65c016d22e72668526d"
}
