Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-22 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-22
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman at me.com
> wrote:

>
> Since it's possible that block timestamps aren't chronological in order,
> what would happen if a block following a size increase trigger is back in
> the past before the size increase? Would that block have a lower size
> restriction again? Would using block height not be a more stable number to
> work with?
>

The activation or not rule is purely timestamp based. Blocks with a
timestamp less than 1452470400 have a limit of 1MB. There could be an 8MB
block followed by a block that is limited to 1MB.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150622/2fbf6432/attachment.html>;