Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-24 📝 Original message:On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-07-24
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Friday 24. July 2015 05.37.30 Slurms MacKenzie via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > It's worth noting that even massive companies with $30M USD of funding don't
> > run a single Bitcoin Core node,
>
> I assume you mean that they don't have a Bitcoin Core node that is open to
> incoming connections. Since that is the only thing you can actually test, no?

We can test the fact that blockchain.info's wallet and block explorer
has behaved in a way consistent with not running a full node - they have
shown invalid data that any full node would reject on multiple
occasions, most recently invalid confirmations during the BIP66 fork.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000006baf20e289b563e3ec69320275086169a47e9c58d4abfba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150724/9fa29c09/attachment.sig>;