Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05 📝 Original message:Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05
📝 Original message:Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
writes:
> However I don't think we've done a good job showing why we need to
> implement this feature via nSequence.

It could be implemented in other ways, but nSequence is the neatest and
most straightforward I've seen.

- I'm not aware of any other (even vague) proposal for its use? Enlighten?
- BIP68 reserves much of it for future use already.

If we apply infinite caution we could never use nSequence, as there
might be a better use tommorrow.

Cheers,
Rusty.