Event JSON
{
"id": "3aa18bbb116c12efc31673f3e34b83f66b3e49768908a4b3dcb9d2e5c8ec46ee",
"pubkey": "c609c8d292688390373b35ca5972f5ad87a0e49653726955428e62a311215300",
"created_at": 1690560347,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"41995660090ab887f92d8d56f838157296544093e3f1bcfc7ab2f13e9cd3644e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"d7af9dea5cd30caf5ea799e5de64434cacbdf4669f094098cfb2f5de2671d742",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5ee86095ccec3e4f5f3cc383c57d261cd9cc336c1e2fd714909695a61bdd825d",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"4588bb61e7a553ca183e7ed6ed3cba17e6a9c9c60c4a7d2ee703715fc678b5ba",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://noagendasocial.com/users/Sirtificate/statuses/110792562900881498"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1gxv4vcqfp2ug07fd34t0swq4w2t9gsynu0cmelr6ktcna8xnv38qythh99 nostr:npub167hem6ju6vx27h48n8jauezrfjktmarxnuy5pxx0kt6aufn36apqqy0399 I need more information (perhaps I just missed it) about why JCD wants section 239 to be abolished. Since JCD holds this view I am certain it has merit. But how does abolishing it do anything other than suppressing freeze peach? And wouldn’t the legal defense from questionable or arbitrary lawsuits by the providers (especially the smaller ones with less capital) be an additional suppressive force?",
"sig": "446abe487de04c7deb13c490c80a7e8c1225b7280c9a52ef0e9cd964ce9cb5db332008f832ededbbc2f392680415c64dc636e8503354f38cb703d3f865bec668"
}
