vinney on Nostr: hashes, too. most of cryptography. my point is there is two kinds of non-fungible: ...
hashes, too. most of cryptography.
my point is there is two kinds of non-fungible: something like a hash function run over the same source (will always yield the same result) and "social/network consensus".
and on "digital", I can't think of anything less fundamentally fungible than zeroes and ones. it depends what level of abstraction you're talking about.
Published at
2024-04-21 13:54:48Event JSON
{
"id": "3ac76e8a0fa6602ef35db5a2817d3e5e2c2c854d8f39d036df376739970269ed",
"pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
"created_at": 1713707688,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331"
],
[
"p",
"7df1004b543fb98a3ae2172e8b2bd5b6748f0f973bf3396fd5e63f356d55b90c"
],
[
"e",
"0ce7c17653adcae0be0efb14f19e766a653f74f976c5a32b76dd864064d72e76",
"wss://relay.wellorder.net",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"03bc49d3b837c995a7715cf34e6524ff50aa2687e87fc35daee694e0eda75c12",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"reply"
]
],
"content": "hashes, too. most of cryptography. \n\nmy point is there is two kinds of non-fungible: something like a hash function run over the same source (will always yield the same result) and \"social/network consensus\". \n\nand on \"digital\", I can't think of anything less fundamentally fungible than zeroes and ones. it depends what level of abstraction you're talking about. ",
"sig": "7b185b648d8c83b83f54b5e28cb7c7ae68e3250bdc1c6eb9c7135072d35da5698488bf6bcb80486d5ec07b1d91ac27777059ee03a611a6a534e31f8d981c69d2"
}