ƝαŢꀌαɳ_Ðгαƙ૩ on Nostr: For non-kyc, I understand it. Does it also make sense for kyc? Definitely for forward ...
For non-kyc, I understand it. Does it also make sense for kyc? Definitely for forward privacy when I understand it correctly. But you can't get rid of the exchange's "kyc-stamp". What is your recommendation for this case?
#NewForMe
Published at
2023-11-12 18:05:48Event JSON
{
"id": "3559e631df760cb8b6c5c74fd1b16bf3e2e71915e23eb832186f1e35b30321f2",
"pubkey": "9bfa0d33a926f39170e34139fe3953831ce4bf2f034382b55c66128c7e09ab4f",
"created_at": 1699812348,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"243b34f76e95e6a4996b4e6c2a1189b871a7b151ac1edd6b9f48d052c9b81a3f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"04c915daefee38317fa734444acee390a8269fe5810b2241e5e6dd343dfbecc9"
],
[
"t",
"NewForMe"
],
[
"t",
"newforme"
]
],
"content": "For non-kyc, I understand it. Does it also make sense for kyc? Definitely for forward privacy when I understand it correctly. But you can't get rid of the exchange's \"kyc-stamp\". What is your recommendation for this case?\n\n#NewForMe",
"sig": "2652d093089d20c2f492a978b251d3ede4a417000441d9e65a07d85b0c73d0de2f3d95136549a41b20ac66e6bfa00609982550a5d9f43d3cae977e96ced84001"
}
