Disinformation Expert Aether on Nostr: >Decentralised social media is the only alternative to the tech oligarchy. ...
>Decentralised social media is the only alternative to the tech oligarchy.
404media.co/decentralized-social-media-is-the-only-alternative-to-the-tech-oligarchy/
This is not untrue so far as it goes. There are just a couple of problems with the statement:
1. this complaint arises out of the author feeling there is a LACK of censorship on Facebook and X.
2. we already have the thing they want. It's called Usenet. It still exists.
3. almost all the direct accusations leveled against individuals made by the author are lies and potentially legally actionable.
4. most of the decentralised platforms (poast and other instances of the Fedi this side of the great wall of Mastodon exclused) built recently like Mastodon and Bluesky are shitholes run by people who are sad that they were born too late to serve as Cheka informants.
5. the author himself is an unreformed Stalinist loon who despises everything that is right and good in the world:
>A legion of the worst people on Earth have spent years building admittedly resilient alternative social media sites after being deplatformed from or rage quitting sites like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. Places like Rumble, Gab, Truth Social, Odysee, and Patriots.Win are full of the worst America has to offer, but people on these websites have been successful in seeding (often false, often hateful) narratives that filter up the power chain and often end up getting repeated by Donald Trump or on more widely viewed right wing media like Fox News
So it's a choice of light censorship by a coterie of partially reformed billionaires and jews who have decided there is a need for a goyim release valve or totalitarian oppression by shitlibs, marxists and jews too neurotic to realise the need for a goyim release valve.
404media.co/decentralized-social-media-is-the-only-alternative-to-the-tech-oligarchy/
This is not untrue so far as it goes. There are just a couple of problems with the statement:
1. this complaint arises out of the author feeling there is a LACK of censorship on Facebook and X.
2. we already have the thing they want. It's called Usenet. It still exists.
3. almost all the direct accusations leveled against individuals made by the author are lies and potentially legally actionable.
4. most of the decentralised platforms (poast and other instances of the Fedi this side of the great wall of Mastodon exclused) built recently like Mastodon and Bluesky are shitholes run by people who are sad that they were born too late to serve as Cheka informants.
5. the author himself is an unreformed Stalinist loon who despises everything that is right and good in the world:
>A legion of the worst people on Earth have spent years building admittedly resilient alternative social media sites after being deplatformed from or rage quitting sites like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. Places like Rumble, Gab, Truth Social, Odysee, and Patriots.Win are full of the worst America has to offer, but people on these websites have been successful in seeding (often false, often hateful) narratives that filter up the power chain and often end up getting repeated by Donald Trump or on more widely viewed right wing media like Fox News
So it's a choice of light censorship by a coterie of partially reformed billionaires and jews who have decided there is a need for a goyim release valve or totalitarian oppression by shitlibs, marxists and jews too neurotic to realise the need for a goyim release valve.