JOSE FEMENIAS CAÑUELO [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-11-01 📝 Original message:Hi, I am trying to follow ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-11-01
📝 Original message:Hi,
I am trying to follow this Simplicity proposal and I am seeing all over references to ‘jets’, but I haven’t been able to find any good reference to it.
Can anyone give me a brief explanation and or a link pointing to this feature?
Thanks
> On 31 Oct 2017, at 22:01, bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The plan is that discounted jets will be explicitly labeled as jets in the
> commitment. If you can provide a Merkle path from the root to a node that
> is an explicit jet, but that jet isn't among the finite number of known
> discounted jets,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20171101/ab3d6aa3/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Hi,
I am trying to follow this Simplicity proposal and I am seeing all over references to ‘jets’, but I haven’t been able to find any good reference to it.
Can anyone give me a brief explanation and or a link pointing to this feature?
Thanks
> On 31 Oct 2017, at 22:01, bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The plan is that discounted jets will be explicitly labeled as jets in the
> commitment. If you can provide a Merkle path from the root to a node that
> is an explicit jet, but that jet isn't among the finite number of known
> discounted jets,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20171101/ab3d6aa3/attachment.html>;