Cassidy James :eos: :gg: :fh: on Nostr: If a large open source project wanted to implement useful, on-device, ML-powered ...
If a large open source project wanted to implement useful, on-device, ML-powered features to make it genuinely better, would you be intrigued? Excited? Sad? Angry? Indifferent? And why?
How would they communicate what they're doing without being vilified for “doing AI”? Are there certain approaches to ML they should avoid?
(You may recognize the melody of this discussion from previous posts of mine…)
Published at
2024-10-02 18:00:46Event JSON
{
"id": "013aa2947eae0212fbe1c813526972d2de7a6f9b342e971261cc69bb99127d2d",
"pubkey": "155c7af498274a045ba66b5bc073ed110382fed7401a11e2334ce3b749dc8629",
"created_at": 1727892046,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4f22444e4550fd32facf084b9a228ad216869bbbf913bcb212f20cebc3e32dc4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"content-warning",
"Nuanced question about “AI”—ignore if you’re unable/unwilling to have a calm discussion"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.blaede.family/users/cassidy/statuses/113239133136708151",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "If a large open source project wanted to implement useful, on-device, ML-powered features to make it genuinely better, would you be intrigued? Excited? Sad? Angry? Indifferent? And why?\n\nHow would they communicate what they're doing without being vilified for “doing AI”? Are there certain approaches to ML they should avoid?\n\n(You may recognize the melody of this discussion from previous posts of mine…)",
"sig": "cda0317fc1f202603495a1268f6a2f7b8ab562079ca2726936ec4607d0962e8035907cdfe758715ad32be8f694cb6ab7c1cca39917626745f8d5bf13b302a81e"
}
