Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2017-05-30 š Original message:That would invalidate any ...
š
Original date posted:2017-05-30
š Original message:That would invalidate any pre-signed transactions that are currently out there. You can't just change the rules out from under people.
> On May 30, 2017, at 4:50 PM, James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem is a non-issue. Donezo.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170530/aa4c361d/attachment.html>
š Original message:That would invalidate any pre-signed transactions that are currently out there. You can't just change the rules out from under people.
> On May 30, 2017, at 4:50 PM, James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem is a non-issue. Donezo.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170530/aa4c361d/attachment.html>