Mark A Lemley on Nostr: Now that we know from 303 Creative that "an individual “does not forfeit ...
Now that we know from 303 Creative that "an individual “does not forfeit constitutional protection simply by combining multifarious voices” in a single communication," "many of the world’s great works of literature and art were created with an expectation of compensation", and "The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy", I look forward to the Supreme Court confessing error in the Andy Warhol case and applying those principles
Published at
2023-06-30 14:08:24Event JSON
{
"id": "074fb3e24abc107d5d29b5eebce4418d7e6351fdb9400c94274576b94c58a0e0",
"pubkey": "0b17739d2ee44eb48b3dd1eb74d122da868fe5a722736b9f43c70c82fe1a7354",
"created_at": 1688134104,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/marklemley/statuses/110633556685393882"
]
],
"content": "Now that we know from 303 Creative that \"an individual “does not forfeit constitutional protection simply by combining multifarious voices” in a single communication,\" \"many of the world’s great works of literature and art were created with an expectation of compensation\", and \"The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy\", I look forward to the Supreme Court confessing error in the Andy Warhol case and applying those principles",
"sig": "55ac002fb035dcb8ff552e7a1d79ba9f830100a853d65cb75331c2e3cda4e51d1bb13009c150812e69242914bbf590e01008a91d973471e7d6d658f9454cda66"
}