Event JSON
{
"id": "0751c5a096261e25cc7c526b73748b76d7e503d85ed3f9975a7d56130a0a9056",
"pubkey": "80cf54525c1df38d505c91c4e675a48f520636a7286ffd3e70557c091a9e3fa9",
"created_at": 1719082591,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://urbanists.social/@enobacon/112661796690749847",
"web"
],
[
"p",
"80cf54525c1df38d505c91c4e675a48f520636a7286ffd3e70557c091a9e3fa9"
],
[
"e",
"1eb126f0feb017bf8e88f8f7e2f4d6b98d03b067b7d9fe348ddad179d115e414",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7290ec2b9a029aedda426b99de74f34910084a7cc185c989b24bde258abe4193",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ad11ed13412e896b6ca23249987fb0b9a0d3aefd6e64c12423dfe44eab2278b1"
],
[
"p",
"e9156102f546915506af943863ea888346fa1f84d9f1fd99f285afd128d6ccd4"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://urbanists.social/users/enobacon/statuses/112661796690749847",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://urbanists.social/users/enobacon/statuses/112661796690749847",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"expiration",
"1721682699"
]
],
"content": "There are ranked voting methods that count votes by more representative methods than IRV / STV's plurality-first, but they're not the ones being pushed by Rockefeller money. In IRV, if everyone universally agrees on a second choice but that candidate doesn't have a large enough plurality of first-choice voters, they're eliminated first. Proportional STV is slightly less worse, but those 200-year-old methods are proven to not deliver what is promised. https://equal.vote",
"sig": "51b40bd0d447d9c674c35e9af72c187ac58fc8afec719545c562e47cbf4dd2c93bfa3b418c55a0f19813558921af029e042eb11bbb03b379828bfc2645497ae2"
}