Silner on Nostr: I could argue that 1+1 is a proof. Maths solutions are always proofs. What we usually ...
I could argue that 1+1 is a proof. Maths solutions are always proofs.
What we usually mean by a solution is a method or mechanism.
Many people prefer stools or beanbags. And when you describe people reaching the same conclusion. I would call that a consensus rather than a realisation.
On your last point we seem to have different premises.
I don't think filecoin or Nexo are good investments. But I do think they're interesting ideas.
Not every use of blockchain will make money, but that isn't the only reason to use a system.
Gold isn't only used as measure of value. It has even more valuable scientific uses.
Nano materials will get cheaper and cheaper but their utility is beyond monetary value.
What we usually mean by a solution is a method or mechanism.
Many people prefer stools or beanbags. And when you describe people reaching the same conclusion. I would call that a consensus rather than a realisation.
On your last point we seem to have different premises.
I don't think filecoin or Nexo are good investments. But I do think they're interesting ideas.
Not every use of blockchain will make money, but that isn't the only reason to use a system.
Gold isn't only used as measure of value. It has even more valuable scientific uses.
Nano materials will get cheaper and cheaper but their utility is beyond monetary value.