BTCtoOblivion on Nostr: It's becoming more and more clear that reducing the blocksize (with removing witness ...
It's becoming more and more clear that reducing the blocksize (with removing witness discount) would be good for #bitcoin .
Maybe we may not get consensus initially but as more and more plebs see more and more spam on #bitcoin , they will realize the importance of not including spam in the #bitcoin and the cost of running their own node.
Just to be clear, even if spammers spam the 80% of blockspace of small blocks, it still makes sense to reduce the blocksize because it will still help with #bitcoin decentralization.
It's also becoming more and more clear that there is absolutely no reason to not run knots at this point. If you are miner then point your hash to OCEAN (npub1qtv…7dze).
Plebs should be ditching the #bitcoin core by now. If they don't do that then either they don't understand #bitcoin properly yet or they don't understand the real risk of spamming on #bitcoin.
cc GrassFedBitcoin (npub1wnl…n3wr)
Luke Dashjr (npub1lh2…a9nk)
giacomozucco (npub1au2…t53j)
Maybe we may not get consensus initially but as more and more plebs see more and more spam on #bitcoin , they will realize the importance of not including spam in the #bitcoin and the cost of running their own node.
Just to be clear, even if spammers spam the 80% of blockspace of small blocks, it still makes sense to reduce the blocksize because it will still help with #bitcoin decentralization.
It's also becoming more and more clear that there is absolutely no reason to not run knots at this point. If you are miner then point your hash to OCEAN (npub1qtv…7dze).
Plebs should be ditching the #bitcoin core by now. If they don't do that then either they don't understand #bitcoin properly yet or they don't understand the real risk of spamming on #bitcoin.
cc GrassFedBitcoin (npub1wnl…n3wr)
Luke Dashjr (npub1lh2…a9nk)
giacomozucco (npub1au2…t53j)