Grant Gulovsen on Nostr: Sorry but this seems like such a stretch: Asserting that the manufacturers of vaping ...
Sorry but this seems like such a stretch:
Asserting that the manufacturers of vaping products should be held liable for property damage caused by "students trying to find locations to vape," and "costs to install and repair security devices to halt student access to common vaping locations?"
Really?
Whatever happened to proximate cause? Is that still a thing? 😂
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/public-nuisance-claims-altria-s-vaping-trial-highlights-potential-expansion
Asserting that the manufacturers of vaping products should be held liable for property damage caused by "students trying to find locations to vape," and "costs to install and repair security devices to halt student access to common vaping locations?"
Really?
Whatever happened to proximate cause? Is that still a thing? 😂
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/public-nuisance-claims-altria-s-vaping-trial-highlights-potential-expansion