Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:Seems like a lot of effort ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over
things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better
prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their
"level" which is split into five as follows:
1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)
2. Peer Services
3. RPC
4. Implementations
5. Applications
I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http://
blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html
If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP
draft for this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/f4c1bf75/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over
things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better
prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their
"level" which is split into five as follows:
1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)
2. Peer Services
3. RPC
4. Implementations
5. Applications
I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http://
blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html
If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP
draft for this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/f4c1bf75/attachment.html>