npub1wx848…qgd2w npub1hykuc…73p33 In all the AP classes I took (late '80s) there ...

npub144k…j6j3

2024-01-17 03:15:51

in reply to nevent1q…jax0

npub1wx84823aazwtw5ctc80e64a40g7e24hhrausvg6yyau98squmchssqgd2w (npub1wx8…gd2w) npub1hykucplphuhelaxutcw4jw3vuu7gcg42czhqmk7jhchs8vdga4fsj73p33 (npub1hyk…3p33) In all the AP classes I took (late '80s) there was *some* review for the exam that involved practices, but it was mostly just going over what sorts of topics tended to be covered, with practice exams mostly covering *how* the exam worked rather than hyper-specific methods of trying to optimize scores (e.g., for AP English, what a typical literary critique/analysis question would look like and what it would ask). The AP English rubric I mentioned was the actual College Board grading rubric from exams administered a year or two beforehand, rather than an in-class preparation, which is part of the reason it came to mind as such a big difference from Cory's description of weeks upon weeks of fine-tuning essay style and format as part of AP English nowadays.

Author Public Key

npub144k6kkuwcvdh4gg9x20pfn9d5akarlv3s4r8wenyh3mlntyvv6uq38j6j3

Show more details

Published at

2024-01-17 03:15:51

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "0581b58203ff4de353d12a1b8dd1dfb094cb12fc16a93b60888c380b3551cccb", "pubkey": "ad6dab5b8ec31b7aa105329e14ccada76dd1fd918546776664bc77f9ac8c66b8", "created_at": 1705461351, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "718f53aa3de89cb7530bc1df9d57b57a3d9556f71f79062344277853c01cde2f", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "b92dcc07e1bf2f9ff4dc5e1d593a2ce73c8c22aac0ae0ddbd2be2f03b1a8ed53", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "ce01823c49b2cc39c2d3ab859608e1e477fde0880d76e6fa9e2c3fadbed28da7", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "21856daf84c2e4e505290eb25e3083b0545b8c03ea97b89831117cff09fadf0d", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "5c860ef55db95aea75a1f7063c930b8ed81672bc0807b97edd637a0ec9564af6", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "content-warning", "Long thread/16" ], [ "proxy", "https://c.im/users/dpnash/statuses/111769115148257079", "activitypub" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub1wx84823aazwtw5ctc80e64a40g7e24hhrausvg6yyau98squmchssqgd2w nostr:npub1hykucplphuhelaxutcw4jw3vuu7gcg42czhqmk7jhchs8vdga4fsj73p33 In all the AP classes I took (late '80s) there was *some* review for the exam that involved practices, but it was mostly just going over what sorts of topics tended to be covered, with practice exams mostly covering *how* the exam worked rather than hyper-specific methods of trying to optimize scores (e.g., for AP English, what a typical literary critique/analysis question would look like and what it would ask). The AP English rubric I mentioned was the actual College Board grading rubric from exams administered a year or two beforehand, rather than an in-class preparation, which is part of the reason it came to mind as such a big difference from Cory's description of weeks upon weeks of fine-tuning essay style and format as part of AP English nowadays.", "sig": "bef4e948f39f37adf72b71684e66956b44e19f67c82d405bb18eec4b681eb30c852b4409543dfd7b33e94e8a152b488d623322ae91bd3be8c6b1aa86f454e922" }