Jack D on Nostr: I understand your point, but your analogy is off. You can't make a ruler with that ...
I understand your point, but your analogy is off. You can't make a ruler with that small of length increments because the Planck length is the smallest possible length and it is larger than your hypothetical ruler increments. Reality is in fact quantifiable with distinct units. Pi is not a length, nor is a square root, so how based in reality is math? Perhaps math is merely the realm of the imaginary but following rules of noncontradiction. It is a tool for prediction.
Published at
2025-01-04 06:12:31Event JSON
{
"id": "05fdb122fc950c10993a9ffbcbf3e28058b530c8257a1825d850d784610626fb",
"pubkey": "21580a98aaf64f7d66705abe7bf7a7acf4ee440fcf6b59d0b76e16217824d895",
"created_at": 1735971151,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"79e2e021c8b8af490f1e2f6cdc3ad9c184cc1c49472ce9510cd34446af911430",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"6ad3e2a34818b153c81f48c58f44e5199e7b4fc8dbe37810a000dce3c90b7740"
]
],
"content": "I understand your point, but your analogy is off. You can't make a ruler with that small of length increments because the Planck length is the smallest possible length and it is larger than your hypothetical ruler increments. Reality is in fact quantifiable with distinct units. Pi is not a length, nor is a square root, so how based in reality is math? Perhaps math is merely the realm of the imaginary but following rules of noncontradiction. It is a tool for prediction.",
"sig": "4b6d955b93b34f67320ae0f9119d63d764c29b9c7d0f53c1d9160494633c29b4705bfdf3a775c93b8d5ac7b7c1976953137c0ae748dc726b26d49dd341dab0c4"
}
