Maoyi on Nostr: 诺斯特的本质还是 sns & app，传统 web2 sns & app ...

诺斯特的本质还是 sns & app，传统 web2 sns & app 通过兜售用户信息和流量用广告和互联网金融获得盈利。web3 sns & app 同样需要这样的方式进行。

获客，卖广告，开发互金……可持续发展以及自我造血功能，是保持长期存在的必要条件。

强如马斯克，也需要拉拢投资，兜售产品，参与政治。

尽快建立诺斯特广告和互金机制，以及对应的合作组织联盟，至关重要。

杰克多尔西已经离开诺斯特很久了，销售、策划以及统一的广告合作联盟，统一的互联网金融机制平台应该提上日程了。

让技术盈利理所应当。

quoting nevent1q…6seg

I love Nostr, and I am worried about Nostr's future. If Nostr fails, one of the most important reasons is that developers will leave.

One of the most important reasons for Nostr's rapid development is that #[0] generously donated to establish the #[1] open source fund. Like many developers, I joined the ranks of Nostr developers because of Jack's call. Jack solved the problem that developers were most worried about, which was to establish Opensats to provide future developers with sustainable development funding support.

Opensats has become a semi-official symbol of Nostr. However, the board of directors of Opensats does not abide by the rules they have announced. Instead, they refuse funding based on a clause that is not in the funding rules at all. It is the GitHub active statistics table. They prefer to fund projects that no one has heard of or used, but whose GitHub statistics tables are beautiful. They will not review your code that you have put a lot of work into, nor will they use your product. They refuse you just because the statistics table is not active. If this is one of the Opensats funding rules, please add this rule to the funding rules. And make it public on the Opensats website.

Opensats should consider that many infrastructure operations do not need to update GitHub every day. And they have a lot of work to do. They also need funds to support their continued operations. You can also formulate separate funding rules for infrastructure operation developers. So that they can apply for funds better.

I love Nostr, and I hope Nostr will get better and better. #[2] #[3] #[4] 💜🫂🫡

#Nostr #Opensats

note1620…63en
note1mze…j2hp
note13al…75xf
note1eqr…h32p