Luiz Pessoa on Nostr: npub1skvad…laky3 npub1rzzkq…e4rlh npub1xkwas…e7jwu npub17cuvf…zy38u ...
npub1skvad2l2wrxgdmt6yxk9kt2rjhw5tucjzhf54pktfq2gg0qhgwyqdlaky3 (npub1skv…aky3) npub1rzzkquy85gym4wfe97wqstmlpe3a80t9rpdsht7837jdg5h8kyds4e4rlh (npub1rzz…4rlh) npub1xkwaswarxtyfywx0exf0ve9kheuzj4c6py745r6fvfm0nfz6ctlsne7jwu (npub1xkw…7jwu) npub17cuvfp5zv4xd7t2aqxtcg3d424zelh7j5em588c2hdwtrmtvav7s5zy38u (npub17cu…y38u) npub1l6z090ftgra8zpf2yncaqyyxxzm3rjuuwum4rcwkg2tftk48f8ysqnn47m (npub1l6z…n47m)
I hadn't been here for a few days but I think you're right actually. The bottom line is that "process" in psychology and neuroscience is way underspecified. Because our theories/studies are not sufficiently formalized, precise or "mechanistic", the term gets used as a potent filler. It's way too malleable and in that way deviates strongly from the "things vs. processes that philosophers talk about. But as Cian said it can also overlap!
I'll try to write something coherent soon.
I hadn't been here for a few days but I think you're right actually. The bottom line is that "process" in psychology and neuroscience is way underspecified. Because our theories/studies are not sufficiently formalized, precise or "mechanistic", the term gets used as a potent filler. It's way too malleable and in that way deviates strongly from the "things vs. processes that philosophers talk about. But as Cian said it can also overlap!
I'll try to write something coherent soon.