ij on Nostr: Hmmm, #Proxmox Backup Server with #NFS as storage backend seems to have its ...
Hmmm, #Proxmox Backup Server with #NFS as storage backend seems to have its drawbacks:
- it seems to use more storage space:
storage 5.9T 3.2T 2.8T 54% /srv/zfs
10.10.0.10:/mnt/pool/backup/pbsbackup 6.0T 3.8T 2.3T 63% /mnt/datastore/storage
- it seems to be slower than on ZFS (via iSCSI) on the same storage server
ZFS R/W: 826M/433M
NFS R/W: 223M/459M
Benefit of using NFS (in this case on #TrueNAS) would be that you can easily increase the quota on the share. That's a little bit more complicated with iSCSI target.
Maybe something for nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqfxu34qljyr8frlwzy05ktrw5qk4ydx255h8ug59yad3h6ak6swhq73l2cr (nprofile…l2cr) to have a look into it in a new video?
Screenshot: results of bonnie++ on ZFS and NFS
- it seems to use more storage space:
storage 5.9T 3.2T 2.8T 54% /srv/zfs
10.10.0.10:/mnt/pool/backup/pbsbackup 6.0T 3.8T 2.3T 63% /mnt/datastore/storage
- it seems to be slower than on ZFS (via iSCSI) on the same storage server
ZFS R/W: 826M/433M
NFS R/W: 223M/459M
Benefit of using NFS (in this case on #TrueNAS) would be that you can easily increase the quota on the share. That's a little bit more complicated with iSCSI target.
Maybe something for nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqfxu34qljyr8frlwzy05ktrw5qk4ydx255h8ug59yad3h6ak6swhq73l2cr (nprofile…l2cr) to have a look into it in a new video?
Screenshot: results of bonnie++ on ZFS and NFS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8049/b8049f4cb61f65478bd60ad54522ac4c992970f6" alt=""