Koz Ross on Nostr: My understanding from every tutorial is that the two _should_ co-move, since the ...
My understanding from every tutorial is that the two _should_ co-move, since the carriage is allowed to slide on the rail, but the square section is fixed to the rail. Am I wrong, and if so, how do I achieve what I want, which is for the block and square section to both slide on the rail while retaining the position in the first image.
I won't even _mention_ that the carriage ignores _any_ min and max limits for some reason, but one problem at a time.
Published at
2025-01-07 06:29:11Event JSON
{
"id": "01a3659029349b5fdf37aaae0cc61a75f148f60f0848f0cf483ccef50ac9f16d",
"pubkey": "ea01c28d25fdebef270fb11977d88794eaa6e04210af4e9f0d45d2ca4df3e28e",
"created_at": 1736231351,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"60b1c4999d8117de5c15bf8bf6cab0138e6d64ff9a07518c6b687e6c17e950ca",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaos.social/users/koz/statuses/113785657829765871",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "My understanding from every tutorial is that the two _should_ co-move, since the carriage is allowed to slide on the rail, but the square section is fixed to the rail. Am I wrong, and if so, how do I achieve what I want, which is for the block and square section to both slide on the rail while retaining the position in the first image.\n\nI won't even _mention_ that the carriage ignores _any_ min and max limits for some reason, but one problem at a time.",
"sig": "54122a10a7cb88f3380008bfbc40233868aabc5e34faff1afe0ad98739da7b3ce72212c6310f7bd586c6a8d45d3001e9b274f3957905cca504fce6202e98d7e8"
}
