unclebobmartin on Nostr: From: mikedilger at 11/03 09:52 > We disagree as to the facts. And as to perspective. ...
From: mikedilger at 11/03 09:52
> We disagree as to the facts. And as to perspective. I hear only one side extremism from you so I don't think discussion is a good idea.
I hope we do not disagree as to the facts of Oct 7th.
This is the second time you have made a public accusation against my character. Last week you accused me of supremacism, and now you are accusing me of extremism. I have made no accusations or intimations against you at all. I suggest that you adjust your debating stragegy. Ad hominem attacks are evidence that your argument is weak.
This is also the second time you have engaged with me, and then backed away. In for a penny, in for a pound, I say.
CC: mikedilger (npub1acg…p35c)
CC: unclebobmartin (npub19mu…jnft)
> We disagree as to the facts. And as to perspective. I hear only one side extremism from you so I don't think discussion is a good idea.
I hope we do not disagree as to the facts of Oct 7th.
This is the second time you have made a public accusation against my character. Last week you accused me of supremacism, and now you are accusing me of extremism. I have made no accusations or intimations against you at all. I suggest that you adjust your debating stragegy. Ad hominem attacks are evidence that your argument is weak.
This is also the second time you have engaged with me, and then backed away. In for a penny, in for a pound, I say.
CC: mikedilger (npub1acg…p35c)
CC: unclebobmartin (npub19mu…jnft)