AVERAGE_GARY on Nostr: that's fair. admittedly I am a complete novice when it comes to LN node running (only ...
that's fair. admittedly I am a complete novice when it comes to LN node running (only just stood up one in the past couple of months). I mainly base my CLN maximalism around a couple of things:
1. tech stack - CLN is C/Rust where LND is Go. tech stack flame wars are always fun and I've picked my side and it's oxidized.
2. focus - LND creators are focused on building a bridge to a failing system with stablecoins. conversely, it seems like those working the LDK/CLN side are building rails for the future.
3. I've just tangentally heard about more issues impacting those running LND nodes than any other. this could very well be bias due to volume of LND vs CLN on the network but my gut tells me otherwise (again, could be my tech stack bias mentioned in 1.)
both are needed. everything is good for bitcoin. we're winning. code is law of the future.
1. tech stack - CLN is C/Rust where LND is Go. tech stack flame wars are always fun and I've picked my side and it's oxidized.
2. focus - LND creators are focused on building a bridge to a failing system with stablecoins. conversely, it seems like those working the LDK/CLN side are building rails for the future.
3. I've just tangentally heard about more issues impacting those running LND nodes than any other. this could very well be bias due to volume of LND vs CLN on the network but my gut tells me otherwise (again, could be my tech stack bias mentioned in 1.)
both are needed. everything is good for bitcoin. we're winning. code is law of the future.