dtonon on Nostr: I also would like it, but: ...
I also would like it, but:
This proposal is quite similar to NIP-26, unfortunately it requires a huge update from clients to track the correlation between keys, so it's not really backward compatible.
I also speculated about this problem:
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1363
I'm not totally against it, but its comlexity could actually kill the protocol.
Probably the solution is a NIP-46, using a FROST to create multi-signature bunkers.
Published at
2024-11-29 08:47:49Event JSON
{
"id": "0000132cdff08e3254d099fd590899d45b597b80789393ac90392df23ddff2d7",
"pubkey": "7bdef7be22dd8e59f4600e044aa53a1cf975a9dc7d27df5833bc77db784a5805",
"created_at": 1732870069,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"q",
"a3f2489cf718f401926df4a1d9d66d8c12259dfb52a3af8b98751dfd8fa94aae",
"wss://nostr.wine/"
],
[
"p",
"76c71aae3a491f1d9eec47cba17e229cda4113a0bbb6e6ae1776d7643e29cafa"
],
[
"e",
"42689f9b8fa5347787a983d59d243c2990236458bbf115c564699c1e8569ad90",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root",
"76c71aae3a491f1d9eec47cba17e229cda4113a0bbb6e6ae1776d7643e29cafa"
],
[
"nonce",
"3689348814741922839",
"18"
]
],
"content": "I also would like it, but:\n\nnostr:nevent1qqs28ujgnnm33aqpjfklfgwe6ekccy39nha49ga03wv8280a37554tspz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7fp90d5\n\nI'm not totally against it, but its comlexity could actually kill the protocol.\nProbably the solution is a NIP-46, using a FROST to create multi-signature bunkers.",
"sig": "9a68f048a7dc21366672fa95fa4dde5454f9f0a8164336af68e67433bdb757e1e3b856d6324487b4a80112cce0baa87dafed88f6e51b3e2f0a5630dc51acf9c6"
}
