dtonon on Nostr: Perhaps my language could have been misunderstood. By “I don't care” I meant what ...
Perhaps my language could have been misunderstood. By “I don't care” I meant what I pointed out in the following note, which is that the fact that they may be telling the falsehood does not change the fact that in the last decades the earth system has been put under pressure by many human actions.
I know very little about this subject, but I have noticed that there is often a clash on the subject of temperature and global warming, when the environmental issues are much broader. Indeed, temperature is only one parameter to be monitored, but there are many others, such as the presence of chemicals in the air, soil, plants and animals. Or like the incidence of certain diseases.
So when I see a graph that focuses on the change in temperature of the planet over 500 million years I sense the risk of bringing attention to a single parameter, which perhaps is indeed completely normal, consequently dragging everything else into denialism.
But as I said, I know little about this area and my reaction was probably too knee-jerk, although I think it has its own logic.
I know very little about this subject, but I have noticed that there is often a clash on the subject of temperature and global warming, when the environmental issues are much broader. Indeed, temperature is only one parameter to be monitored, but there are many others, such as the presence of chemicals in the air, soil, plants and animals. Or like the incidence of certain diseases.
So when I see a graph that focuses on the change in temperature of the planet over 500 million years I sense the risk of bringing attention to a single parameter, which perhaps is indeed completely normal, consequently dragging everything else into denialism.
But as I said, I know little about this area and my reaction was probably too knee-jerk, although I think it has its own logic.