to be decided on Nostr: > .. I don't think that means that it is impossible for anything to have enough ...

> .. I don't think that means that it is impossible for anything to have enough microstate knowledge to derive useful work from it.

I obviously cannot fathom how this could ever be possible.

On the other hand, sometimes my mind takes this non natural sciences angle on things for a second and I just think: considering how crazy/curious/strange/weird/beautiful the mere fact that "things exist at all" is, it sure wouldn't be that much more crazy if things like wormholes or telepathy existed as well.