to be decided on Nostr: Wild take: reducing the individual work hours to 20 a week would also make labor more ...
Wild take: reducing the individual work hours to 20 a week would also make labor more scarce and thus force wages up up.
Sure, having many people work relatively few hours per person is significantly less efficient than fewer people working long hours but as with everything, there's also a tradeoff: efficiency vs xyz.
Published at
2024-04-30 09:18:57Event JSON
{
"id": "00001dec2d15c73eb5067b57209bee02f380e7e3af7bcceb54bd9615bc24fad7",
"pubkey": "853eb9e37472091da18dcb63b7fd83cffc413479dafab949b5f33f017a2dd92b",
"created_at": 1714468737,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9"
],
[
"e",
"6ef4bf97c5a22ece55f0722c0f36952fddbe382f4ff0a4d6e2b677cea501fc03",
"wss://a.nos.lol/",
"root"
],
[
"nonce",
"177896",
"19"
]
],
"content": "Wild take: reducing the individual work hours to 20 a week would also make labor more scarce and thus force wages up up.\n\nSure, having many people work relatively few hours per person is significantly less efficient than fewer people working long hours but as with everything, there's also a tradeoff: efficiency vs xyz.",
"sig": "96f5fd153f66397cf84d502ab125108fba7c9b66da33c104983d705f96c954694a32c234e86a994f8ad79974163bfffa4f7ddab6173fe541c26a94cc6fe1aec3"
}
