veervrrr on Nostr: ปฏิวัติสยาม ค.ศ. 1688 ...
ปฏิวัติสยาม ค.ศ. 1688 ส่อไปในทางบูรณะของเก่า ไม่ได้มีความหมายในทางก้าวหน้าแบบที่ควรจะมีใน revolution สมัยนี้ แต่ว่าในแง่ประชาชนมีส่วนร่วมก็อาจจะเรียกปฏิวัติได้
"Lastly, it considers whether the events of the coup and its immediate aftermath were shaped by anti-Christian emotion. As a movement with conservative and restorative aims, 1688 was not a ‘revolution’ in the modern sense, but it may have ushered in an enlarged sense of popular investment in the legitimation of royal contenders associated with the defence of Buddhism."
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5d1d3346-b1c2-42df-ad82-b8468997e762/download_file?file_format=application%2Fpdf&safe_filename=Strathern_2021_Thailands_first_revolution.pdf&type_of_work=Journal+article
"Lastly, it considers whether the events of the coup and its immediate aftermath were shaped by anti-Christian emotion. As a movement with conservative and restorative aims, 1688 was not a ‘revolution’ in the modern sense, but it may have ushered in an enlarged sense of popular investment in the legitimation of royal contenders associated with the defence of Buddhism."
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5d1d3346-b1c2-42df-ad82-b8468997e762/download_file?file_format=application%2Fpdf&safe_filename=Strathern_2021_Thailands_first_revolution.pdf&type_of_work=Journal+article