alicexbt [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-04-22 📝 Original message:Hi TheBlueMatt, >> There ...
📅 Original date posted:2022-04-22
📝 Original message:Hi TheBlueMatt,
>> There are at least three or four separate covenants designs that have
>>> been posted to this list, and I don't see why we're even remotely
>>> talking about a specific one as something to move forward with at
>>> this point.
>>
>>> To my knowledge none of these other proposals (drafts, really) have
>>> actual implementations let alone the many sample usages that exist for
>> CTV.
> You can fix this! Don't point to something you can easily remedy in the > short-term as an argument
> for or against something in the long-term.
How can we fix this? If a proposal already fixed it, does it have some consensus or it was fixed in a different way?
/dev/fd0
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220422/eb77b668/attachment-0001.html>
📝 Original message:Hi TheBlueMatt,
>> There are at least three or four separate covenants designs that have
>>> been posted to this list, and I don't see why we're even remotely
>>> talking about a specific one as something to move forward with at
>>> this point.
>>
>>> To my knowledge none of these other proposals (drafts, really) have
>>> actual implementations let alone the many sample usages that exist for
>> CTV.
> You can fix this! Don't point to something you can easily remedy in the > short-term as an argument
> for or against something in the long-term.
How can we fix this? If a proposal already fixed it, does it have some consensus or it was fixed in a different way?
/dev/fd0
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220422/eb77b668/attachment-0001.html>