Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2011-12-20 šļø Summary of this message: Luke-Jr and ...
š
Original date posted:2011-12-20
šļø Summary of this message: Luke-Jr and Amir Taaki discussed getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on the IANA index, but never heard back.
š Original message:OK, give me a shout on IRC. It is a lot of work though, so be prepared. Bring bags of patience :)
________________________________
From: Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:59:00 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> A few weeks back I was in discussion with the IANA on getting a bitcoin URI
> accepted in the standard. As a prerequisite I had to read 5 huge
> documents. I did not end up writing that RFC.
I also contacted the IANA about getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on their
index, however never heard back. If you want, please have whoever you
discussed it with get in touch with me. Either way, please be sure whatever
they index is compliant with the spec on the wiki as-is (especially not being
BTC unit specific, as this is clearly non-scalable).
Luke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111220/90b3ac38/attachment.html>
šļø Summary of this message: Luke-Jr and Amir Taaki discussed getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on the IANA index, but never heard back.
š Original message:OK, give me a shout on IRC. It is a lot of work though, so be prepared. Bring bags of patience :)
________________________________
From: Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:59:00 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> A few weeks back I was in discussion with the IANA on getting a bitcoin URI
> accepted in the standard. As a prerequisite I had to read 5 huge
> documents. I did not end up writing that RFC.
I also contacted the IANA about getting the bitcoin URI spec accepted on their
index, however never heard back. If you want, please have whoever you
discussed it with get in touch with me. Either way, please be sure whatever
they index is compliant with the spec on the wiki as-is (especially not being
BTC unit specific, as this is clearly non-scalable).
Luke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111220/90b3ac38/attachment.html>