Scott Jenson on Nostr: Every single "design tool" I've seen with LLMs right now looks good at VERY SPECIFIC ...
Every single "design tool" I've seen with LLMs right now looks good at VERY SPECIFIC things. Push it just a tiny bit outside of it's bounds and it looses the plot. Every single time. This is still valuable, sure, but only at the low level tedious work.
I'm not a luddite! These tools are going to be capable, but mostly at taking routine tasks (e.g. layout in a known space) and making it super fast.
2/3
Published at
2024-03-19 18:04:23Event JSON
{
"id": "0f94d3d305862f560e4e64cd53d866dc009f542a9d107b6bbc98d25008e01c32",
"pubkey": "19a1def6c76345f4a23fc410a64cc761593494f9c528cd018f454d70714ab044",
"created_at": 1710871463,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8ec3558cf47dadfa734073664f6532a2ebf819cd43d96a528312c961122b177b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.coop/users/scottjenson/statuses/112123672264713783",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Every single \"design tool\" I've seen with LLMs right now looks good at VERY SPECIFIC things. Push it just a tiny bit outside of it's bounds and it looses the plot. Every single time. This is still valuable, sure, but only at the low level tedious work.\n\nI'm not a luddite! These tools are going to be capable, but mostly at taking routine tasks (e.g. layout in a known space) and making it super fast. \n2/3",
"sig": "7f9aa357ea8aed580790b67cfb92e4360fa91132dedf0ca11bbb987a83ff30ce2e630607f9536f8932956f06791e88e9c3be1490f1a031fb3f72004cfa5db95c"
}
