Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-04-04 📝 Original message:Tom, It's clear that you ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-04-04
📝 Original message:Tom,
It's clear that you have some rather large gaps in your knowledge of Bitcoin, its rules, implementation and game theory. I highly encourage you spend some time learning more about these things before continuing posting here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/ is a good place to start. It's a safe place where you can ask any question you want without fear of being laughed at.
Kind regards,
Jean-Paul
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> That's BIP30, he linked BIP34: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L3004
>
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Can you tell me where it is enforced?
>>
>> The only place I found was here;
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1793
>>
>> which doesn’t enforce it, all that code does is check that the txid is
>> unknown or fully spent.
>> And since the below idea from Russel would change the txid, it would seem no
>> full client would reject this.
>>
>> Maybe its in a BIP, but I can’t find it in the code.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:59:12 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
>> > It is a consensus rule
>> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
>> >
>> > <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move
>> > >> the
>> > >>
>> > >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you
>> > >> considered doing this?
>> > >
>> > > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make any
>> > > day.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tom Zander
>> Blog: https://zander.github.io
>> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170404/d77e03fd/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Tom,
It's clear that you have some rather large gaps in your knowledge of Bitcoin, its rules, implementation and game theory. I highly encourage you spend some time learning more about these things before continuing posting here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/ is a good place to start. It's a safe place where you can ask any question you want without fear of being laughed at.
Kind regards,
Jean-Paul
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> That's BIP30, he linked BIP34: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L3004
>
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Can you tell me where it is enforced?
>>
>> The only place I found was here;
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1793
>>
>> which doesn’t enforce it, all that code does is check that the txid is
>> unknown or fully spent.
>> And since the below idea from Russel would change the txid, it would seem no
>> full client would reject this.
>>
>> Maybe its in a BIP, but I can’t find it in the code.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:59:12 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
>> > It is a consensus rule
>> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
>> >
>> > <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move
>> > >> the
>> > >>
>> > >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you
>> > >> considered doing this?
>> > >
>> > > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make any
>> > > day.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tom Zander
>> Blog: https://zander.github.io
>> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170404/d77e03fd/attachment.html>;