l0k1 on Nostr: TIL that manjaro linux's packages (the main binaries accessible via pacman) are quite ...
TIL that manjaro linux's packages (the main binaries accessible via pacman) are quite substantially out of date compared to the parent disttro Arch linux.
The difference is like night and day, I HATE manjaro. Nothing of my hardware works right with it and the stuff that I get from Arch is smooth as butter.
I just gotta iron out my data retention policies so I don't wipe out all of them at the same time like I did this morning.
I have fast reflexes and fast fingers but SSDs are even faster. It zapped most of the important files for booting the system and the only way to get back to it is to install arch. Putting manjaro on it all of the libraries were out of date, the pacman database had duplicated entries...
I just challenge anyone who had assumed there was no real difference between Arch and Manjaro.
You will almost certainly agree manjaro is second rate in comparison.
The difference is like night and day, I HATE manjaro. Nothing of my hardware works right with it and the stuff that I get from Arch is smooth as butter.
I just gotta iron out my data retention policies so I don't wipe out all of them at the same time like I did this morning.
I have fast reflexes and fast fingers but SSDs are even faster. It zapped most of the important files for booting the system and the only way to get back to it is to install arch. Putting manjaro on it all of the libraries were out of date, the pacman database had duplicated entries...
I just challenge anyone who had assumed there was no real difference between Arch and Manjaro.
You will almost certainly agree manjaro is second rate in comparison.