corndalorian on Nostr: Probably. But the fact that the Supreme Court upheld the law is deeply concerning. ...
Probably. But the fact that the Supreme Court upheld the law is deeply concerning. The perceived threat was based on what TikTok could do, not on anything it had actually been accused and found guilty of. I worry this sets a dangerous legal precedent in case law.
Published at
2025-01-17 21:27:38Event JSON
{
"id": "0b8308df6a234eef459ff72d23dd1f822a02a9ced7c64fcb9ba1e787601ac552",
"pubkey": "f8e6c64342f1e052480630e27e1016dce35fc3a614e60434fef4aa2503328ca9",
"created_at": 1737149258,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7fdf9fa230cb4075728d2a186f4eebbbaa19356bd27bb4d46637d3bca1008b66",
"wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a080d3390802afebc1cdaf14daf2468caf85168451c3d4af16e00e5961a716cf",
"wss://nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c5e173798dad29dd2b8062b8310974aed0a72e3645f9e58d2129bc6abd15d8bf"
]
],
"content": "Probably. But the fact that the Supreme Court upheld the law is deeply concerning. The perceived threat was based on what TikTok could do, not on anything it had actually been accused and found guilty of. I worry this sets a dangerous legal precedent in case law. ",
"sig": "6dcca846ff35afb367bdddb035d85987eeb5ec693b45888c30e49fa372b8de710d2c649fbfb426b1069339a32de2b380cfee33869501f42e7e20692d683be275"
}
