probius on Nostr: It seems that at least some of the 5th circuit ruling (admittedly one (and only?) ...
It seems that at least some of the 5th circuit ruling (admittedly one (and only?) circuit, and criminal vs reporting requirement) in Tornado cash could come into play here, Both the post-Chevron rulemaking authority of an agency. And even though a tornado cash smart contract is "back-end", the extent of "front-end" code control is similar to that described in the tornado opinion.
This would also seem to require addtional code to comply with, which might raise some "force speech" issues.
Published at
2024-12-27 18:52:52Event JSON
{
"id": "0cb5fc957a5e406838c27fbaf7f3aea87a1864d2668881886af801180e63e5dc",
"pubkey": "4644b82d1e486e060633425649344d8c929a2ab2c7de428781711d34598a0376",
"created_at": 1735325572,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d8a6ecf0c396eaa8f79a4497fe9b77dc977633451f3ca5c634e208659116647b"
],
[
"e",
"618481c8db6a3f7d8ae6827fe40141dd56c52173e1ceeef2a41ee07b9fd40133",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/",
"root"
]
],
"content": "It seems that at least some of the 5th circuit ruling (admittedly one (and only?) circuit, and criminal vs reporting requirement) in Tornado cash could come into play here, Both the post-Chevron rulemaking authority of an agency. And even though a tornado cash smart contract is \"back-end\", the extent of \"front-end\" code control is similar to that described in the tornado opinion. \nThis would also seem to require addtional code to comply with, which might raise some \"force speech\" issues.",
"sig": "464d970c14643555350780566516d482a278699e52870056beafd6a0e268b375fdf6ed196d2c99c4d86b33b95ee292e656385ce443a8c9a1ee3e0a5ee86eb685"
}