kravietz 🦇 on Nostr: npub1uyxyr…mdmcm Correct, #ACTA was genuine but that’s why I’m writing it in ...
npub1uyxyr55xy9auvwxym75a38rgr5jsc29x08hwh65n6pl9l8wuzunskmdmcm (npub1uyx…dmcm)
Correct, #ACTA was genuine but that’s why I’m writing it in double quotes (“ACTA2”). That campaign was manipulative in every single aspect of it, starting from the “ACTA2” name and ending with an obscure website which collected people’s emails and provided zero information on who manages it. The Copyright Directive (2019/790) had literally nothing to do with the original ACTA, it was processed in the normal legislation track with full transparency so the whole point of linking it to ACTA was to build a negative association. The whole “Stop ACTA2” was a classic smear campaign, likely orchestrated by the usual GAFAM suspects and I see the their fingerprints in the eIDAS campaign too.
Correct, #ACTA was genuine but that’s why I’m writing it in double quotes (“ACTA2”). That campaign was manipulative in every single aspect of it, starting from the “ACTA2” name and ending with an obscure website which collected people’s emails and provided zero information on who manages it. The Copyright Directive (2019/790) had literally nothing to do with the original ACTA, it was processed in the normal legislation track with full transparency so the whole point of linking it to ACTA was to build a negative association. The whole “Stop ACTA2” was a classic smear campaign, likely orchestrated by the usual GAFAM suspects and I see the their fingerprints in the eIDAS campaign too.