Martinx - ジェームズ [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-09-22 🗒️ Summary of this message: The message ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-09-22
🗒️ Summary of this message: The message describes an error when trying to connect to the Bitcoin network and an unknown exception causing a segmentation fault.
📝 Original message:Hi!
When my network goes down and I close the Bitcoin, I see the following
message:
---
martinx at floyd:~$ ./bitcoin-0.4.0rc2/bin/32/bitcoin
connect: Network is unreachable
************************
UNKNOWN EXCEPTION
bitcoin in CMyApp::OnUnhandledException()
Segmentation fault
martinx at floyd:~$
---
Thanks,
Thiago
2011/9/22 Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
> Hi John!
>
> Thank you for your answer...
>
> I have "two kinds" of address, the "static address", which I created
> myself for any personal reason, and the "dinamic address", which is the
> automatic generated address when I receive some Bitcoin amount, I label each
> one (the automatic created by the software) with something like "DINAMIC-1",
> "DINAMIC-2" and so on...
>
> I use my "dinamic address" in a "random" way, following the moon phase...
> lol
>
> My point is: I like to keep track of all my Bitcoin Address, they are all
> my...
>
> Please, leave this feature alive, as a option, disabled by default.
>
> I don't know why people fear about their own address... It is all under
> "Receiving" tab! There is nothing to fear about it.
>
> ---
>
> BTW, I think this option should have some explanations at the "Options
> screen", for example:
>
> For increasing your anonymity, enable the "Dinamic Bitcoin Address" option
> and make sure to always use one new and different address for each
> transaction. And do not link each address with your person!
>
> (X) Dynamic Bitcoin Address (a new Bitcoin Address will be created
> automatically for you, after each new received Bitcoin amount)
>
> ---
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> Best,
> Thiago
>
> 2011/9/22 John Smith <witchspace81 at gmail.com>
>
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/22 Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi everybody!!
>>>
>>> This is my first message here... I'm ThiagoCMC at bitcointalk...
>>>
>>> Well, one of the features that I like most is that, every time I receive
>>> some Bitcoin amount, a new address appear at my "AddressBook"automatically,
>>> AND, I like to track it.
>>>
>>
>> Can I ask your rationale for this?
>>
>> From what I've noticed, most people's workflow is to create a new
>> receiving address for each new contact that sends them bitcoins (either for
>> every transaction, or they reuse the address for this person). To make sure
>> that the address is labeled, they create it themselves and then give out the
>> generated address.
>>
>> They are utterly spooked by suddenly appearing unlabeled addresses, of
>> which they are unsure whether they are used, and which can never be removed.
>>
>> I'm fine with adding it back as an option but please leave it disabled by
>> default...
>>
>> JS
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110922/67f08fa4/attachment.html>;
🗒️ Summary of this message: The message describes an error when trying to connect to the Bitcoin network and an unknown exception causing a segmentation fault.
📝 Original message:Hi!
When my network goes down and I close the Bitcoin, I see the following
message:
---
martinx at floyd:~$ ./bitcoin-0.4.0rc2/bin/32/bitcoin
connect: Network is unreachable
************************
UNKNOWN EXCEPTION
bitcoin in CMyApp::OnUnhandledException()
Segmentation fault
martinx at floyd:~$
---
Thanks,
Thiago
2011/9/22 Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
> Hi John!
>
> Thank you for your answer...
>
> I have "two kinds" of address, the "static address", which I created
> myself for any personal reason, and the "dinamic address", which is the
> automatic generated address when I receive some Bitcoin amount, I label each
> one (the automatic created by the software) with something like "DINAMIC-1",
> "DINAMIC-2" and so on...
>
> I use my "dinamic address" in a "random" way, following the moon phase...
> lol
>
> My point is: I like to keep track of all my Bitcoin Address, they are all
> my...
>
> Please, leave this feature alive, as a option, disabled by default.
>
> I don't know why people fear about their own address... It is all under
> "Receiving" tab! There is nothing to fear about it.
>
> ---
>
> BTW, I think this option should have some explanations at the "Options
> screen", for example:
>
> For increasing your anonymity, enable the "Dinamic Bitcoin Address" option
> and make sure to always use one new and different address for each
> transaction. And do not link each address with your person!
>
> (X) Dynamic Bitcoin Address (a new Bitcoin Address will be created
> automatically for you, after each new received Bitcoin amount)
>
> ---
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> Best,
> Thiago
>
> 2011/9/22 John Smith <witchspace81 at gmail.com>
>
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/22 Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi everybody!!
>>>
>>> This is my first message here... I'm ThiagoCMC at bitcointalk...
>>>
>>> Well, one of the features that I like most is that, every time I receive
>>> some Bitcoin amount, a new address appear at my "AddressBook"automatically,
>>> AND, I like to track it.
>>>
>>
>> Can I ask your rationale for this?
>>
>> From what I've noticed, most people's workflow is to create a new
>> receiving address for each new contact that sends them bitcoins (either for
>> every transaction, or they reuse the address for this person). To make sure
>> that the address is labeled, they create it themselves and then give out the
>> generated address.
>>
>> They are utterly spooked by suddenly appearing unlabeled addresses, of
>> which they are unsure whether they are used, and which can never be removed.
>>
>> I'm fine with adding it back as an option but please leave it disabled by
>> default...
>>
>> JS
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110922/67f08fa4/attachment.html>;