James Grimmelmann on Nostr: Sixth Circuit non-administratively stays the FCC's network neutrality order, citing ...
Sixth Circuit non-administratively stays the FCC's network neutrality order, citing the major questions doctrine: https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/1/24211570/net-neutrality-sixth-circuit-stay-blocked-fcc
For me, this shows the essential lawlessness of the MQD. There are non-trivial arguments that broadband Internet services should be classified as an "information" service or as a "tecommunications” service—indeed, the FCC has had BOTH interpretations upheld by the courts. At least Judge Sutton’s concurrence actually reads the relevant terms of the statute.
For me, this shows the essential lawlessness of the MQD. There are non-trivial arguments that broadband Internet services should be classified as an "information" service or as a "tecommunications” service—indeed, the FCC has had BOTH interpretations upheld by the courts. At least Judge Sutton’s concurrence actually reads the relevant terms of the statute.