David Mitchell on Nostr: npub1lzz05…djhl3 This analysis is correct but misses the forest in examining this ...
npub1lzz05275zkk6zwuzel45jusr74ftyyuah8zll8vl09k98w8smy7qedjhl3 (npub1lzz…jhl3)
This analysis is correct but misses the forest in examining this tree.
“But for the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, it defies explanation.”
Exactly.
His engagement in these cases is doing an excellent job of demonstrating his contempt for the courts… that’s the point. It signals his followers to also have contempt for the courts. It tells them that law is not an impediment to action and it is an implicit promise that he will overturn the courts in their favour.
This analysis is correct but misses the forest in examining this tree.
“But for the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, it defies explanation.”
Exactly.
His engagement in these cases is doing an excellent job of demonstrating his contempt for the courts… that’s the point. It signals his followers to also have contempt for the courts. It tells them that law is not an impediment to action and it is an implicit promise that he will overturn the courts in their favour.