Ron [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-07-15 📝 Original ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-07-15
📝 Original message:________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:19 +0200
From: Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Protocol Specification
To: Krzysztof Okupski <k.okupski at googlemail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
    <CANEZrP21sc9smev5tg07HnLpw-8WWS7EvzzTyEvD6qYEfHvpoA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Nice work, but please don't call it the "Bitcoin protocol spec". Your
document is not a spec. It is an attempt to describe in English the Bitcoin
protocol, but anyone who implemented it based on your description would get
it wrong. For example you didn't mention the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug and many
other important areas like the difficulty transitions are also left
unspecified.

As a loose description of the protocol for newbies it's an invaluable
resource and perhaps we should link to it from the developer guide. As
something that claims to be a specification it is quite possibly dangerous
- the only spec that matters is the C++ original.
...

Hello Mike,

What C++ original might that be?  Version 0.1.0? 0.9.x? 0.8.6?  And what parts of which version?

Ron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140714/e6af2665/attachment.html>;